LogoCSFPTagline


Stay Connected:

CSFP Twitter 

Contact CSFP

search this site

Founded in 1995, the Colorado School Finance Project's (CSFP) mission is to compile, collect and distribute research-based, non-partisan information and data on topics related to school finance for state and local policy makers.

1995-2015: Celebrating our 20th Anniversary!

The Principles of School Finance: What is a School Finance System? For more information on School Finance, go to our School Finance 101 tab.

CURRENT TOPICS

May 2015

CSFP's Colorado School Finance & Education Reform Timeline - 1980 - 2016. May 2015 update.

CSFP Colorado School Finance and Education Reform Timeline

 

CSFP Presentation to Colorado Education Initiative (CEI) Colorado STEM Network (CSN) May Conference Call.

 

CSFP Discussion: CSFP Equity Analysis - Overview

 

Student Centered Accountability Project: Bruce Hankins, Superintendent Dolores County Schools, and Brian Hanson, Superintendent Mancos School District RE-6, presented to the State Board on May 14, 2015 their rural alternative assessment and Student Centered Accountability Project.

 

On April 20, 2015 the CSFP emailed all 178 Colorado school districts and the Charter School Institute asking for a response to the question:

What Would You Do with Additional Funds?

On April 21st, we began tweeting responses.  We will continue tweeting responses each day in an attempt to capture district needs across the state.  We know everyone isn’t on twitter, so the tweets are captured here.  The list is updated through Wednesday, May 6, 2015. Our thanks to districts for their insight. For those of you on twitter: We are using the hashtag #k12needsco (K12 Needs CO).

Background on the Negative Factor: Since 2009, Colorado school districts have been negatively impacted by the Negative Factor / Rescissions; forcing districts to cut budgets and continue to make reductions.

Negative Factor by Fiscal Year:

  • FY 2009-10: $130M
  • FY 2010-11: $381M
  • FY2011-12: $774M
  • FY2012-13: $1.001B
  • FY 2013-14: $1.004B
  • FY 2014-15: $880.1M
  • FY 2015-16: Estimated $855.1M

 

Dwyer v CO - Dwyer Order Setting Oral Argument Dwyer v State of CO. Prior information pertaining to the Dwyer (Amendment 23) v CO lawsuit is available here, Amendment 23 Dwyer v CO tab.

 

April 2015:

CSFP Presentation to Colorado Education Initiative (CEI) Colorado STEM Network (CSN) April Conference Call.

 

Dwyer v CO - April 22, 2015 - Reply to Plaintiff's Response to Order and Rule to Show Cause (State's reply)- Amendment 23. Prior information pertaining to the Dwyer (Amendment 23) v CO lawsuit is available here, Amendment 23 Dwyer v CO tab.

 

NOW WHAT? March Estimates and Possible Fixes - Carol Hedges, Colorado Fiscal Institute: Presentation to CSFP.

Who Are Colorado's Students? 2014-15 - one page summary of Colorado's students.

 

March 2015:

Dwyer v CO - March 23, 2015 - Response and Amicus Briefs - Amendment 23. Prior information pertaining to the Dwyer (Amendment 23) v CO lawsuit is available here, Amendment 23 Dwyer v CO tab.

 

Natalie Mullis, Chief Economist, Colorado Legislative Council Staff presentation to CSFP: Colorado Legislative Council Services March Forecast and Memorandum to JBC on the March Revenue Forecast, General Fund Overview: OSPB and Colorado Legislative Council Services forecasts.

 

Superintendents Position Paper: "Endorsed by 174 Colorado superintendents representing more than 92% of the public school students in our state, this statement communicates our collective position on the foundational issue of public school funding."

February 2015:

Quality Counts 2015 (2011-12 School Year, FY 2012)

  1. Per Pupil Spending by State: Colorado ranks 43 of 51 in per pupil spending; spending $2,715 less than the U.S. Average of $11,735,
  2. Percent Total Taxable Resources Spent by State: Colorado ranks 39th.
  3. School Finance Grade by state. Colorado ranks 41st with a D+.
  4. Nearby States Spending More Per Pupil than Colorado. Colorado spends $2,715 less than the U.S. average.
    • Kansas spends $2,379 more than Colorado
    • Montana $4,204 more
    • Nebraska $4,437 more
    • New Mexico $716 more
    • Wyoming $8,738 more

CSFP Presentation to Colorado Education Initiative (CEI) Colorado STEM Network (CSN) February Conference Call.

 

Henry Sobanet, Office of State Planning and Budget: Presentation to CSFP: Colorado State Budget, TABOR, Amendment 23.

 

Great Education Colorado, Presentation to CSFP: Finding Common Ground on Common Core, results of facilitated conversations about standards, taxes and solutions. Great Education's "Keep the TABOR Surplus for Kids" petition is available here, and on their website.

 

2014 State Profile Data: Our annual profile information depicts changes in K-12 funding and counts (comparing 1992-93 to 2007-08 to 2011-12 to 2012-13). Prior State Profile information is in the State Profile Data tab.

  • CSFP Profile Data: 2014 Highlights: is a 2-page overview of all state profile data highlighting areas of concern for K-12.
  • CSFP State Profile Data: 4 tables and Notes (italicized items are new this year):
    • Table 1: Enrollment (Funded Pupil Count and Membership), Special Education, Free and Reduced Lunch, ELL (2 year funded and total ELL served), Instances of Mobility, Gifted and Talented. Note that all per pupil calculations are on Membership count.
    • Table 2: Number of Teachers, Teachers per 1,000 students, Average Salary
    • Table 3: Per Student Current Spendng and Revenues - New: State/Local Revenue without Overrides (See Notes for further information on this item).
    • Table 4: Relationship between State/Local Revenue for K-12 Public Education and Personal Income, New: Overrides in Local, Negative Factor
    • Notes: Footnotes for all tables are located on the Notes pages.

Dwyer Order and Rule to Show Cause - Colorado Supreme Court. Additional information:

 

A recently released study by Northwestern University & University of California on The Effects of School Spending on Educational and Economic Outcomes Evidence from School Reforms:

Purpose of Study: To understand whether, how and why school spending affects student outcomes. Findings: Researchers found that increased per-pupil spending, induced by school finance reforms narrowed adult socioeconomic attainment differences between those raised in low-income and high-income families. They find that money does matter and that better school resources can meaningfully improve the long-term outcomes of recently educated children.

 

Three Years of Negative Factor by district - FY 2011-12 thru FY 2013-14. Totals by district and Fiscal Year. The CSFP will update this report with FY 2014-15 data once that data is final. Data source: CDE, district by district final reports, February 2015.

 

January 2015:

The Education Writers Association, using recent National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) data on Revenues and Expenditures for Public Elementary and Secondary Education: School Year 2011-12 FY 2012, created an interactive map containing data for each state. The article: How the United States Spent $600B on Schools SY 2011-12 FY 2012. The interactive map is here. The CSFP also used this data in our annual Trends in Per Pupil Spending.

 

CSFP Presentation to Colorado Education Initiative (CEI) Colorado STEM Network (CSN) January Conference Call.

 

Natalie Mullis, Chief Economist, Colorado Legislative Council Staff presentation to CSFP: Colorado Economy and State Budget Outlook.

 

Chart: Colorado's PK-12 Membership continues to increase as funding decreases:

As Colorado's PK-12 membership and At-Risk count have increases, rescissions and the Negative Factor have decreased funding.  Over 1/3 of Colorado's students are At-Risk, based upon the Federal Guidelines for Free Lunch.

 

Update to CSFP Trends in Per Pupil Spending illustrates the gap between Colorado and the national average, 1991-92 through 2011-12. Data sources include the U.S. Census Bureau, Colorado state Profile Data, Education Week; Quality Counts, and the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). Figures are audited data, so lag behind current spending numbers. For the past 20 years, the gap has continued to grow; from less than $500 per student in the early to mid-1990s to between $1,800 and $2,800 less by FY 2011-12.

Gap in Colorado K-12 Per Pupil Spending over the last 20 years.

Read the Colorado Public Radio report: Colorado per-pupil spending lags US Average even more, report says, January 14, 2015, about the Trends in Per Pupil Spending chart above.

 

 

Note: Typically our Home page contains information from the last 6 months. We try to "roll off" information every month to our Historical Info page. The information is in chronological order, most recent first.

Back to Top